US Abandons Long Time Allie Israel – Should our Other Allies Be Worried?

Joe Biden’s State Dept Abandons Long Time Allie Israel: Should our Other Allies Be Worried?

In a recent and pivotal moment at the United Nations, the United States chose not to exercise its veto power against a resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza. This decision has sparked intense debate and concern among those who stand with Israel, viewing it as a critical ally in the Middle East. Supporters argue that this move not only undermines Israel’s position but also emboldens Hamas, an organization that the United States and many other countries have designated as a terrorist organization due to its long history of attacks against Israeli civilians.

Hamas has been the clear aggressor in the ongoing conflict, launching thousands of rockets indiscriminately into Israeli territory, aiming to cause maximum civilian casualties. Israel, in its defense, has responded with military actions aimed at neutralizing Hamas’s capability to launch further attacks. The principle of self-defense is enshrined in international law, and Israel’s actions can be seen within this framework, particularly given the existential threats it faces.

Hamas’s Terrorist Attacks

Hamas’s terrorist activities over the years, including:

  • 2001 Dolphinarium Discotheque Suicide Bombing: The attack killed 21 people, primarily Israeli teenagers, at a Tel Aviv nightclub.
  • 2002 Passover Massacre: A Hamas suicide bomber killed 30 people and injured 140 during a Passover seder at the Park Hotel in Netanya.
  • 2014 Kidnapping and Murder of Israeli Teenagers: The incident escalated violence, with three Israeli teenagers kidnapped and murdered by Hamas members.
  • Rocket Attacks: Discuss the numerous rocket attacks launched by Hamas from Gaza into Israeli territory, emphasizing their indiscriminate nature aimed at civilian populations.

The Principle of Self-Defense

Discuss the right to self-defense as enshrined in international law, citing the United Nations Charter. Argue that Israel’s military responses to Hamas attacks are within its right to protect its citizens. Compare Israel’s targeted responses to the indiscriminate nature of Hamas’s attacks.

The failure of the United States to veto the UN resolution sends a concerning message on several fronts. First, it may be perceived as a weakening of the long-standing US-Israel alliance, which has been a cornerstone of Middle East peace and stability. The United States has historically stood by Israel, recognizing the unique challenges it faces in a region often hostile to its very existence.

Secondly, by allowing the resolution to pass, there is a risk of legitimizing Hamas’s actions, inadvertently equating the terrorist group’s indiscriminate attacks with Israel’s right to defend its citizens. Such an equivalence can undermine international efforts to combat terrorism and could embolden other terrorist groups by showing that their actions can lead to diplomatic concessions.

Moreover, the resolution does not address the root causes of the conflict or the need to disarm Hamas and prevent it from rearming. A ceasefire, while temporarily halting hostilities, does not remove the threat that Hamas poses to both Israeli and Palestinian civilians. Without a comprehensive approach to peace that addresses security concerns, promotes political dialogue, and fosters economic development, ceasefires may only serve as interludes between cycles of violence.


In conclusion, the United States’ abstention from vetoing the Gaza ceasefire resolution at the UN signifies a momentous and unprecedented shift, arguably positioning it in opposition to its long-standing ally, Israel, and indirectly alongside entities globally recognized as terrorists. This move not only disrupts the established dynamics of international alliances but also prompts serious reflections on the trajectory of global counterterrorism strategies. It emphasizes the critical need for the international community to grasp the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and to pursue strategies that embody the principles of security, justice, and human dignity for all involved. Central to this endeavor is the unequivocal support for Israel’s right to defend itself against terrorism, coupled with the advocacy for initiatives that address the humanitarian needs of the Palestinian populace. However, the ultimate path to peace lies in a systematic approach to dismantling Hamas and other terrorist organizations, ensuring that measures are taken to eliminate the threat they pose to stability and security. This approach, while challenging, is essential for creating a sustainable and just peace that benefits all parties involved.